Saturday, 18 February 2012

Stability


When, back at university, Syenna and I decided that having a family was the life for us, we thought only about when would be the best point in our lives to try and do this.  This left us with a choice:
1. Start as soon as we finish university
2. Have a career (each) first
Now, most people seem to choose number 2.  It's the sensible option.  There is the chance to secure yourself in a job, buy a house and earn a reasonable income.  This means that you might be able to afford private education, fantastic holidays and millions of other opportunities for your young family. 

However, we considered that parenting may be hard work, and so best tackled when you are younger and fresher.  Plus, from looking at internet forums and from research elsewhere, we saw how difficult it could be to actually have children, and a race against the (biological) clock seemed a stressful way to start a family.

So, we chose number 1.  Syenna chose it because it gave us the best chance of actually having a family, and also gave our (potential) children the best chance of a healthy life (chromosomal disorders and the like being more probable as the parents age).  I chose it mainly because number 2 was the sensible option.

It wasn't the smoothest path to starting our parenting journey, but we're here and I have no doubts that we chose correctly.  We are exhausted all of the time, but probably less so than we would be if we tried the same in 15 years.  We have never had the chance to get used to hoards of disposable income and so get caught up with buying the latest gadgets, going on holiday or whatever people do with it.  And, we still have the option of having more children, now or when H,C and R are a bit older (although difficult to imagine coping with any more children at present!)
current house
first house
second house

But just as H&C always opt for a 'mixture' when eating cereal, I can't help but wonder what it would be like if we had the pros of both choices.  A stable career, a house and a family.  At work, my contract runs out in October of this year and although I may be able to stay on, nothing is guaranteed.  And so, I have been looking around at other jobs, and houses near to those.  It would mean living in our 4th house since H&C were born but I would be able to continue my career, which is probably the least stressful path.  If I didn't have children, I would be raring to go; anything to climb that ladder!  But now, I have a different perspective.  I just want to settle down and embed myself somewhere.  I want to feel as if I belong, and give our children the chance to feel like that too.

2 comments:

  1. I LOVE that story. I think you both kick ass for carving your own path. It's something to be proud of.

    I identify with what you're saying completely; I often wonder if stability is just a state of mind because no job or anything really, is certain. However, I crave stability too. Or at least, a game plan.

    Do you think the boys will be OK with more moves? I imagine being settled in one place is probably more important when they're a little older. It's something I'm contemplating a lot too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Hannah!

    I feel that there is this knock on effect with stability: If we know that we are going to stay somewhere for a long time, we can afford to 'invest' more time into making the place we live more homely and getting to know the area around us more intimately, which gives more feelings of stability!

    Wrt to the boys and moving, I'm really not sure. I don't think Rupert will mind, as his world is quite small anyway, it will pretty much move with him. H&C may find it harder, but I agree that it wont be such a big deal now compared to, say 4 or 5 years time. It definitely needs some careful thought...

    ReplyDelete